Welcome to the site where the owners and members have had it with playing "nice" and being "inclusive" and "tolerant" of points of view that are destroying the fabric of what made this country great. The members here are sick and tired of politicians of all parties lying, deceiving, stealing, and pretending they are doing it all for the good of the country while selling out to special interests who have the set goal of destroying this country. We have had enough of career politicians who use their office only for personal gain, and who refuse to listen to the people who put them in office. The membership is no longer part of the silent majority who play nice and get along while getting screwed by anyone with a loud voice and an agenda. We will no longer allow anyone to piss down our back and tell us it's raining. And we like guns too.



Go Back   DIRTYDOZENSBUNKER, LLC > Main > Rifles
Photo Gallery DDB Store Arcade Register

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-10-2019, 04:34 PM   #1
Sanders
Moderator
 
Sanders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 66,543
Default This Day in History: Watermelons Help Secure AR15 Military Order

Quote:
Were it not for the military's adoption of the AR15 as the M16, the gun designed by Eugene Stoner may have just been a footnote in American arms development. As is often the case, civilian interest in arms is driven by what the military is using. On July 4, 1960, when Air Force General Curtis LeMay attended a BBQ at a farm in Maryland owned by Dick Boutelle, President of Armalite Division, Fairchild Hiller Corporation, he unknowingly set in motion the steps necessary for the AR15 to become widely regarded as “America's Rifle.”
https://www.ammoland.com/2019/07/thi...#ixzz5t1rQRpls
__________________

"The truly dangerous man dresses inconspicuously and is soft- spoken. He walks away from most confrontations. The only time you learn that the truly dangerous man is mad at you is a split second before you die, for he never fights. He only kills. The truly dangerous man knows that fighting is what children do and killing is what men do." - Charley Reese 1986
3
Sanders is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2019, 12:08 PM   #2
MrKalashnikov
Deplorable
 
MrKalashnikov's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Behind The Iron Curtain
Posts: 8,106
Default

Some neat photos in that article. I'll bet Curtis LeMay would be surprised to know his melon-buster is still going strong today, albeit in a somewhat different configuration.
MrKalashnikov is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2019, 12:57 PM   #3
44044
slug
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: swampeastmissouri
Posts: 50,986
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrKalashnikov View Post
Some neat photos in that article. I'll bet Curtis LeMay would be surprised to know his melon-buster is still going strong today, albeit in a somewhat different configuration.
Watermelons are good

Guns are bad...
44044 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2019, 09:17 AM   #4
But Its A Dry Heat
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Southern AZ
Posts: 799
Default

Should have gone with the FAL.
But Its A Dry Heat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2019, 11:07 AM   #5
Sanders
Moderator
 
Sanders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 66,543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by But Its A Dry Heat View Post
Should have gone with the FAL.
You'll get no argument from me on that.

Someone should have pointed out to the good general that those were watermelons, not motivated enemies trying to kill him. While the .22 makes holes, the .308 caliber makes bigger holes - in one side and out the other, and can turn cover into concealment.
Sanders is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2019, 10:50 PM   #6
But Its A Dry Heat
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Southern AZ
Posts: 799
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sanders View Post
You'll get no argument from me on that.

Someone should have pointed out to the good general that those were watermelons, not motivated enemies trying to kill him. While the .22 makes holes, the .308 caliber makes bigger holes - in one side and out the other, and can turn cover into concealment.
It would be a bitch to lug around enough ammo but if you hit something they would stay down and had a lot better track record. That was not the time to have an experimental weapon. jmo
But Its A Dry Heat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2019, 11:25 PM   #7
baboon
slug
 
baboon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Out by the lake in central Texas
Posts: 18,329
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sanders View Post
You'll get no argument from me on that.

Someone should have pointed out to the good general that those were watermelons, not motivated enemies trying to kill him. While the .22 makes holes, the .308 caliber makes bigger holes - in one side and out the other, and can turn cover into concealment.
From hunting of game animals I generally found animals that the bullet stopped inside wether fragmented or retaining most of its weight killed the animals quicker. Personally I never thought pass threw bullets were effective in killing game.

I also believe the effects of hydrosatic shock is a great killer.
baboon is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2019, 01:24 AM   #8
4thIDvet
slug
 
4thIDvet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Astor Florida
Posts: 48,478
Default The original M16s got their first big test in the jungles of Vietnam, and it was in a bad way the second it got out of the crate.

. The Brass had told the men in the field that the rifles were self-cleaning (mistake number 1) and as such, were not issued with cleaning kits (mistake number 2). The third and final mistake that tipped the reliability of the M16 over the deep end was that the Brass had ordered ammunition with ball powder that was of a very dirty burning composition, and loaded to a higher pressure. The original AR15 was designed around the .223/5.56x45 cartridge that used tubular powder. All three of these factors gave the M16 the horrible reputation that they were branded with for the next decade.

https://guns.fandom.com/wiki/Eugene_Stoner
__________________
God Bless Americas Veterans. All who are serving and have served.
4thIDvet is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2019, 01:41 AM   #9
44044
slug
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: swampeastmissouri
Posts: 50,986
Default

I remember seeing men carrying them

wrapped in plastic in the field on the

CBS news...
44044 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2019, 06:03 AM   #10
4thIDvet
slug
 
4thIDvet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Astor Florida
Posts: 48,478
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 44044 View Post
I remember seeing men carrying them

wrapped in plastic in the field on the

CBS news...
44044 must have been moving somewhere and some pin head desk jockey told them to bag em?
Don't think they would be wanting to put them in plastic bags out in the bush? Without the cameras on em they would have used that plastic to keep themselves dry to hell with the weapon it will still work wet or dry.
4thIDvet is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2019, 07:57 AM   #11
44044
slug
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: swampeastmissouri
Posts: 50,986
Default

I figured that it was staged...

IIRC it was a ‘hit piece’ on how

unreliable the M-16 was...

It seems that Dan Rather was the

corespondent, IIRC...

A regular CBS Hit on everything

American
44044 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2019, 06:08 PM   #12
flashy
Omicron cocksman
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Pennslfucky
Posts: 2,609
Fo Shizzle

Seeded or seedless watermelon?
flashy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2019, 11:09 PM   #13
Crusader30-06M1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 2,070
Default

So spend a shitton developing the M14, adopt it, and 4-5 years later begin looking for something else? Sounds about right.

The AR platform obviously works, and is wildly successful, no argument there. Just seems to me, that from what I've read, guys in Vietnam loved the M14 much more than the M16, along with the designated marksmen thirty years later. Not saying the M14 was the answer, but I'm not sold on it being the AR15 platform either. Just some civilian rambling about a somewhat interesting/irritating topic.
Crusader30-06M1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2019, 11:43 PM   #14
4thIDvet
slug
 
4thIDvet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Astor Florida
Posts: 48,478
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crusader30-06M1 View Post
So spend a shitton developing the M14, adopt it, and 4-5 years later begin looking for something else? Sounds about right.

The AR platform obviously works, and is wildly successful, no argument there. Just seems to me, that from what I've read, guys in Vietnam loved the M14 much more than the M16, along with the designated marksmen thirty years later. Not saying the M14 was the answer, but I'm not sold on it being the AR15 platform either. Just some civilian rambling about a somewhat interesting/irritating topic.
Colt was slick Crusader and the books won't tell yah this one. Yup the early Nam vets loved their M-14 and hated the 16 but Colt was slick.
Colt started massive production of the M-16 before they were even awarded the military contract. Toss a few bucks in the right hands show them the train load of M-16s ready to go and guess what?
They new DAMN well the weapon had flaws but who cares money talks nobody walks. Thank you Colt.
4thIDvet is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2019, 04:17 PM   #15
Bluntforce
slug
 
Bluntforce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Allturd State
Posts: 21,896
Chinese

Quote:
Originally Posted by baboon View Post
From hunting of game animals I generally found animals that the bullet stopped inside wether fragmented or retaining most of its weight killed the animals quicker. Personally I never thought pass threw bullets were effective in killing game.

I also believe the effects of hydrosatic shock is a great killer.
Probably explains why the Chink soldiers in North Korea took all those T-n-T hits with the M1 Carbine and did the Timex.
__________________
Bluntforce is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.