10-18-2013, 01:26 PM | #16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,984
|
Quote:
Great board for getting up to speed on those is here: http://forums.gunboards.com/forumdis...The-Rising-Sun LOTS of info on Japanese stuff there. The stock looks almost too good; if it is a repro that will take a hit on the price but if it is original, then whatever you do, do NOT "clean it up/strip it and refinish it to make it look better" or you can cut the value WAY down. Those used a special varnish mixture that you just pretty much cannot match with modern products. IF it is all original and matching with the bayonet, you are probably in the $300-$350 range at full retail. I had one just a bit nicer that sold for $500 a while back, but it took me a while to get that money out of it and mine was an early one, not a later one which helped the price as the quality went down on these as the war progressed. That said, these are great shooting little rifles and personally I would hang onto it a while and shoot it first before you flip it. Ammo isn't on the Wal-mart shelves, but it IS out there. Check Gunbroker if none of the local reloading shops or gun shows in your area have any.
__________________
Will someone kindly tell me how in the fuck did we wake up one day all these years later and find ourselves living in an Ayn Rand novel? |
|
10-18-2013, 01:57 PM | #17 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 44
|
I tried take it all the way down, but I wasn't sure about how. I found some instructions earlier today, so I may take it apart tonight and give it a thorough cleaning. All I did last night was lightly clean up some rust on the outside of barrel & receiver, cleaned & greased the bolt, swabbed the inside of the barrel pretty good, and then light coat of oil on all the metal. I didn't do anything to any of the wood, the bayonet, or the scabbard.
This must be an oddball gun with all the differing reviews. If anybody lives in the Carolinas and wants to possibly pick up this gun, tomorrow may be a good opportunity. There is a fairly big gun show in Charlotte this Sat. and Sun. Oct. 19th & 20th. I will probably go Sat. at least and bring this gun along. |
10-18-2013, 02:08 PM | #18 |
slug
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Astor Florida
Posts: 48,422
|
FireEater. That is in beautiful shape.. Think? mine is 7.7?? Bayonet for it was $125.
Mine has the "aircraft leading sights." Plus the cheap bi-pod.. Bought some old WWII ammo for it, one in 5 rounds went bang.. Damn those bullets are big.. Traded an old AK for it..
__________________
God Bless Americas Veterans. All who are serving and have served. |
10-18-2013, 02:24 PM | #19 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Flarda
Posts: 29,565
|
FireEater, that appears to be a Type 99 rifle. The trigger guard is different from a Type 38. If all of the numbers match I doubt that it is a LD rifle.
For more info about your rifle check this site out: //oldmilitarymarkings.com/japanese_markings.html
__________________
3 Make America Like Florida |
10-18-2013, 02:32 PM | #20 | |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Flarda
Posts: 29,565
|
Quote:
How come you didn't shoulder fire it? I thought you guys from the 2nd Brigade were fearless. |
|
10-18-2013, 02:40 PM | #21 | |
slug
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Astor Florida
Posts: 48,422
|
Quote:
For real had no idea what the hell caliber this thing was? So we put it on the saw-horse in the swamp, got back behind a tree and pulled the rope.. Damn thing did not go bang.. Gave a guy two beers to pull the bolt.. 3rd round went bang and the bullet came out. Cleaned it and heaved it in the gun room.. Damn thing scares me.. Heavy as hell.. How the hell did those little Nips hold and aim them???? |
|
10-18-2013, 08:26 PM | #22 |
Retired Soldier
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South Central PA
Posts: 14,148
|
Quite well based on the number of U.S. Marines, and Army troops they killed with them.
The rifle is heavy, but reasonably well balanced (for a battle rifle). I have fired hundreds of 7.7 rounds through various Type 99 rifles. Less than 100 through Type 38's, but that is more because until recently, I had limited access to 6.5 x 50 Ari. I now have the dies to make my own 6.5 x 50 cartridges, so I plan to correct that little oversight, and work out the bugs in my 6.5 children. The rifle in question is most definitely a 7.7mm Type 99 LD "Last Ditch" rifle. The problem with them is the lower quality of the steel more than anything else. By 1944, the US Army Air Force was bombing the living daylights out of Japan, and so steel production dropped. As such, much of the steel became either poor quality, or mixed quality from miscellaneous sources. The use of slave labor did not help the quality. (Just ask the Nazis about slave labor building highly sophisticated ballistic missile components, IE V2 rockets) Anyway, if you clean the weapon really well, and inspect it thoroughly, including scoping the bore if possible, or if you know someone in the medical field, see if you can get the metal X-rayed. If that does not show any serious defects in the steel, you could try underpowered 7.7 rounds, but I would never charge ammo for an LD over 50% of normal.
__________________
Free citizens are armed citizens, but only armed citizens are truly free! Bruce R. Gadbois 2008 |
10-18-2013, 09:44 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,984
|
Mea culpa on that one. It is indeed a Type 99 last ditch. I was thinking of the Type 99 having the anti-aircraft "wings" on the sight, but forgot that the last ditch rifles dropped those and other details like the metal buttplate, etc. As such, it would be a 7.7 caliber and not a 6.5Jap caliber. Thanks to Horse and RTO for correcting me on that.
|
10-20-2013, 08:44 PM | #24 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 44
|
New home for collector rifle
This rifle belongs in a better place.
I bought it as possibly an inexpensive shooter while helping out a buddy. Now that I know more about it, I want to find it another place to reside because it just isn't the gun for me. I have already listed it locally, but I thought that I should at the very least speak to the people who are kind enough to offer their knowledge on the rifle for free about their possible interest in the classic. I haven't posted it for sale here because I don't do paypal so I'm not sure how comfortable any of you would feel about sending a money order to the noob with no reputation. Also, I worry about sending this piece of history with some of these couriers these days. However, I am open to suggestions if anybody here is interested in giving this rifle a better home. PM me if we need to discuss further or if you want me to e-mail all the pics I have of the gun and bayonet. |
10-20-2013, 10:07 PM | #25 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Flarda
Posts: 29,565
|
FireEater, thanks for the offer. I have enough Jap rifles though.
Rack up a few more posts and put it in the "Wanted to buy/sell/trade" section. You might get a bite. |
10-20-2013, 11:11 PM | #26 |
Burning Liberals
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: portland or
Posts: 243
|
This is a great thread, ive been wanting to get one, for a historical piece, never would have thought there were unsafe ones!
thanks
__________________
|
10-24-2013, 11:42 AM | #27 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 44
|
Yesterday the Arisaka found a new home, and I think it worked out fair. I got my money back out of it with a little profit on top, and the buyer said he is a collector that wants to add the rifle to his collection. The brief conversation with the buyer did encourage me to ask you C&R aficionados about sales etiquette you may or may not use.
When selling to someone, do you always try to divulge as much information about the product as possible even if it disputes what the buyer thinks it is? When I bought this rifle, I knew next to nothing about it, but thanks to posters here, using other www sources, and talking to people more informed than me at a LGS I was able to absorb much knowledge on the subject. The most crucial information I gained about the rifle was the "Last Ditch" version stuff like no cleaning rod, reduced material used on sights, different front barrel band, and wood buttplate on stock. Anyway, the buyer asked what I knew about the Japanese Arisaka so I started telling him. I didn't get far until he took the conversation over telling me that the rifle was missing part of its rear sight. At that point I tried to inform him of the specific LD attributes that make them unique, but he didn't seem to want to hear it. I wasn't there to argue or even debate with him, so I just let him say his peace then hand me the money so we could go our seperate ways. Should I have forced him to listen to what I knew and he didn't in this specific instance? I don't want him to get hurt firing a possibly dangerous weapon, and I do want him to know everything I know about it. Maybe a post-sale email is in order. What do you think? |
10-24-2013, 11:54 AM | #28 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: E-Da-How
Posts: 137,846
|
He 'KNEW' more than you.
Let it ride. Caveat Emptor! |
10-24-2013, 02:16 PM | #29 |
Retired Soldier
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South Central PA
Posts: 14,148
|
Fire;
Self proclaimed experts don't want to hear squat. Just make sure you save a link to this thread, in case he blows the rifle up in his face, and tries to sue you. |
10-24-2013, 05:08 PM | #30 |
slug
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Stover, Missouri
Posts: 33,622
|
Exactly...
Brian
__________________
3 Here at the Dirty Dozen's Bunker, we have no problems, only solutions.
|
|
|