12-30-2008, 10:37 AM | #16 |
Pontificator Maximus
Join Date: May 2006
Location: between the hills
Posts: 8,753
|
In autos .45acp in revolver 357.
|
12-30-2008, 10:49 AM | #17 | |
Mystic Knight of the Sea
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: The Great Swamp
Posts: 81,997
|
Quote:
__________________
.................................................. ....................................… We have met the enemy, and he is us! |
|
12-30-2008, 11:46 AM | #18 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 916
|
The absolute best would be 50 Browning. However you may have a bit of difficulty concealing the pistol.
__________________
"This year will go down in history. For the first time, a civilized nation has full gun registration. Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient, and the world will follow our lead into the future!" -Adolf Hitler,1935 |
12-30-2008, 12:14 PM | #19 |
Cranky Fat Bastard
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Boca Raton,FL
Posts: 2,533
|
I Too Will Give Props To The Tokarev...Very Easy To Conceal With The "Thin" Grips.
Plenty Of Punch, Will Get The Job Done!
__________________
"I'd Rather Be Called A Smart-Ass Than A Dumb-Ass..." [SIZE="4"]3[/SIZE] |
12-30-2008, 02:27 PM | #20 |
Minister of Tar&Feathers
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,634
|
Only issue I could mention about the tok round is that if the target IS NOT wearing body armor,then you have to deal with overpenetration.........
"Is specialty round,for specialty purpose,comrade......." Still my favorite handgun round,just because of how nifty it is. I actually would carry a Cz82,in 9x18 makarov-good concealment,high capacity,and a few other traits as well that endear it to me,that is,if I didnt give all my guns away for those nifty $100 gift cards to buy everyone I know presents this past holiday season....... |
01-02-2009, 11:19 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,504
|
. your getting great advise from compotent & knowlageable freinds,i prefer different products for the time & place, but i'm a little smaller, i think you have bigger choices. go to the gun store and fondle some various products to see what you really like, remember that high capacity large bore autos weigh a lot more loaded than empty.stainelss guns require much less maintainance, and we all need more practice. good luck and let us know how you doo! 3
|
01-02-2009, 11:59 PM | #22 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 9,710
|
I'm a bit smaller too, at least around here. I'm 5'9" and 200 lbs. From my arm pit's to my hips is just about a straight line. The author Robert Adams said that build would make me a good ax man, don't know about that but I was pretty good with a sledge in dad's junkyard. I know, that's a bit fat. But I carry a full size Witness 10mm. I had a leather blazer tailored just for that. Looks good with a turtle neck, at list I think so. I have a compact Witness in 10mm too, but it's not quite as dependable. The Witness fits my hand's well also. It's heavy however. But I can work with that.
|
01-06-2009, 12:25 AM | #23 |
Minister of Tar&Feathers
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,634
|
Well,to revise my statement about the tokarev round overpenetrating,which it will if you use ball and arent shooting at armor,you can find some specialty loads like the ones from Reeds that use projectiles like the XTP from Hornady,which are modern JHP and will expand from the .30 cal starting diameter to somewhere between .40 or .50 and wont penetrate past 14 inches.You can be darn sure that it'll reach around the 'minimum 12 inches' with these loads and expand as well,given the velocity of this round.
http://www.reedsammo.com/ You can also get some JHP loads from wolf,50 round box for about $20.Theyre decent for the price.You can check out some gelatin tests of these JHP loads for tok here- http:/www.brassfetcher.com/762x25mmJHPs.html The tokarev truly is a very versatile round.I wish CZ would make a new pistol that chambers it. As discussed,standard tok lead core ball is actually much more useful than just plinking/target stuff,and being that you can also get some decent defensive loads in the caliber that can make a TT33 or CZ52 not only a great collectors piece,but a great purchase for anyone interested in a highly versatile,unique and/or budget defense pistol.As far as budget is concerned,dont confuse ruggedness and cost effective, 'no frills' manufacture with poor quality.These pistols,while being military surplus and needing to be well looked over before purchase,are top notch. Both of these pistols are not quite pretty,or perfectly ergonomic for that matter-in fact I would state that the handling and looks of both of them are quite bizarre.But for $200? Can't be beat. I call the CZ52 the 'combloc desert eagle'. Are there better choices for a defensive pistol?Sure,whatever you like best is better for you,and to that matter,I think the choice is a very personal issue.If the shoe fits,wear it kinda thing. |
01-06-2009, 08:40 AM | #24 | |
RIP America 1776-2012
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Maine
Posts: 13,443
|
Quote:
__________________
. . Peaceful, but prepared. ........ "Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom of Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any bands of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States." ...........................Noah Webster, 1787 |
|
01-06-2009, 03:58 PM | #25 |
Gone
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Here and Now
Posts: 13,454
|
Rely on my 5-shot 357mag snubby with a couple of speed loaders for concealed.45acp for the rest.
__________________
WOLVERINES!!! "Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect every one who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined"-Patrick Henry |
01-06-2009, 06:29 PM | #26 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: wilmington nc
Posts: 324
|
well it looks like i'll have to agree with the rest,when i carry a revolver,its a snubby .357,but nine times out ten if i carry a auto,its a gi .45,i just bought a kahr cw .40,that will be my main carry till i save the money for a officer framed,commander barrelled kimber
|
01-09-2009, 09:43 PM | #27 |
IncogNegro
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,825
|
Hey fellers. Saw this and thought I would add my 1.5 cents. I agree with most of what's being said here. But it appears that the original poster is a larger fellow, so I would recommend a 10mm for him. Glock makes one, which I have. Awesome cartridge, but it's still a shitty handgun design as far as I'm concerned.
I had a CZ-52 a while back, and I've got to say.... what a shitty firearm. Loved the cartridge on that model too ! But back to the original conversation, I would recommend either .45acp or 10mm. If you're wanting a revolver, you should stick with anything with the word "magnum" on it. Yes, even .22 magnum.
__________________
"Thou shalt not be a son-of-a-bitch". Magnus392, from Rules of Chuck 00011 |
01-10-2009, 03:28 PM | #28 |
Gaw' Blimey Limey
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Round behind the sleazy bars of Telephone Road
Posts: 25,900
|
Bearing in mind that the original poster was looking for the ideal CCW round.
Considering that the kind of conflict likely to be experienced will be something of a 20-foot experience or maybe less, I think that .357 Mag or larger is definitely over-kill, considering the high risk of through & through and the accompanying risk of "co-lateral damage" (i.e. whacking someone other than the guy you are defending yourself against). Same for 9mm and above, with the possible exception of the slowcoach .45 ACP. Just a thought.
__________________
zulu6 out |
01-10-2009, 04:17 PM | #29 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: E-Da-How
Posts: 137,846
|
Center mass or multiple rounds in the guts, and I don't worry about collateral damage.
ONLY the damage to the target subject. |
01-10-2009, 05:47 PM | #30 | |
KaBoom Kontrol Modulator
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Colorado, Western Slope
Posts: 16,229
|
Quote:
Yup! In the concern department I'm 99.99% concerned with adequate penetration and prompt stopping and .01% with 'shoot through'. .45acp was designed to shoot people with, doesn't have a lot left after passing through a carcass. Neither does .44 spcl, .38 spcl, .45 Colt or .357 for that matter! The big fat slow bullet is on purpose. John M Browning originally designed the 1911 for a 185 gr, bullet at a about 950 fps, Army told him no, they wanted to duplicate 45 Colt as close as possible. At least that's my understanding of it, though I know a lot of gun writers seem to worry about 'over penetration' as well as some people who do know what they're talking about and seem to consider it an issue. Regarding the 'over penetration" issue, I fall back on one thing, I usually ask people to point to one or more documented cases of it happening. I tend to see the discussion as one more example of the current bizarre American tendency to fiddle with the fine tuning when they should be changing channels. Fact I think I'll start a thread on that very topic. As always JMHO. Others MMV. Regards, |
|
|
|